News Categories
Resources For Living
Mesothelioma Forum
Legal Help Blog
Find a Doctor Near You
About Mesothelioma
Latest News
- Assessment of Biomarkers in asbestos-exposed worke...
- Malignant Mesothelioma of the Tunica Vaginalis Tes...
- Long-term indwelling pleural catheter (PleurX) for...
- The comparative accuracy of different pleural biop...
- Malignant mesothelioma 2008
- Mesothelioma and asbestos-related pleural diseases...
- Erlotinib plus bevacizumab in previously treated p...
- Asbestos Fibre Concentrations in the Lungs of Brak...
- Lung Cancer Trial Targets Asbestos-Related Disease...
- Image-guided pleural biopsy
News Archives
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Source: DailyInterLake.ComWith one of the highest rates of mesothelioma in the United States and thousands of people with other asbestos-related diseases, Libby, Montana is already the location of a serious public health disaster and—according to a report in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine—the situation is due to get worse in the next two decades. The article, written by pulmonologist and asbestos-disease expert Dr. Alan Whitehouse, concludes that the current situation is merely “the tip of the iceberg” and that a true epidemic of mesothelioma is likely gestating among the citizens of Libby and the surrounding towns.
The cause of this health tragedy was an asbestos-contaminated vermiculite mine that was once the region’s economic lifeblood. The mine was in operation for decades and it employed thousands of people during this time. Even citizens who didn’t work in the mine were likely to be affected by its dust and airborne debris, either by living near it or living with someone who worked there.
The relationship between the mine and the town’s health effects was initially reported in 1999 and the scope of the tragedy has only increased since then. Much of this extra knowledge has come from the clinic that Libby started to track asbestos-related illnesses and provide care for affected residents. The Center for Asbestos Related Disease (CARD) has already documented over 200 deaths related to asbestos exposure and is tracking 2,000 other additional cases of asbestos-related disease.
Dr. Whitehouse’s report, written in close consultation with a number of other doctors—including Dr. Brad Black, the Medical Director for the Center for Asbestos Related Disease—includes studies of people of who worked in the mine, as well as people who had no exposure to asbestos outside of simply being in Libby. Because mesothelioma has a latency period of 30 to 50 years from initial exposure, the report concludes that “The extent of the epidemic of environmental mesothelioma due to exposures based at Libby will probably not peak for another 10 to 20 years…”
Labels: mesothelioma
posted by Belluck & Fox at 11:46 AM
