News Categories
Resources For Living
Latest News
- Efficacy and Safety of Pemetrexed in Combination w...
- Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma as a rare cause ...
- Individual versus standard quality of life assessm...
- The value of occult disease in resection margin an...
- Trimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothe...
- Video-assisted cervical thoracoscopy: a novel appr...
- Characterization of Human Mesothelioma Cell Lines ...
- Megakaryocyte potentiating factor as a tumor marke...
- Surgical Treatment in the Management of Malignant ...
- Epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation, am...
News Archives
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
The efficacy and safety of weekly vinorelbine in relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma
Friday, May 30, 2008
Source: Lung CancerMesothelioma remains one of the most difficult cancers to treat effectively. Even as improvements to the standard therapies have led to small increases in overall survival time for some patients, the disease remains without a cure and most patients diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma will die within two years of diagnosis. The introduction of pemetrexed and cisplatin combination chemotherapy represented a real advancement in the effectiveness of chemotherapy for mesothelioma, but they are approved only as first-line therapy and their use for patients with relapsed mesothelioma is unclear. In fact, very few studies have been completed on second-line chemotherapy so the role of any agent for this purpose is unclear.
In light of this question, researchers from the United Kingdom conducted a study on the use of vinorelbine for second-line chemotherapy. Vinorelbine is a chemotherapy drug commonly used to treat breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer that previous studies have shown has some clinical activity for mesothelioma. The goal of the study was to investigate if vinorelbine was effective and well-tolerated for treating mesothelioma.
Overview of the Study
To investigate the efficacy of vinorelbine as a second-line chemotherapy agent, the researchers selected patients with histologically-confirmed pleural mesothelioma for inclusion in their study. All patients must have previously undergone chemotherapy for mesothelioma, as well as demonstrate a current performance status between 0-2 and adequate lung and organ function. Patients also had to be free of other cancers.
At the time of enrollment, patients were given a CT scan to establish disease status. If a patient presented with a pleural effusion, the effusion would be drained before starting therapy. The treatment protocol stipulated vinorelbine would be delivered on an outpatient basis, once per week. The standard dose administered was 30 mg/m2 of vinorelbine in 20mL of saline; the maximum dose delivered was 60 mg/m2. The patients’ weekly progress would be monitored with blood cell counts and chemistry panels. 6 administrations were considered one chemotherapy cycle and at the end of every cycle, a CT scan was completed to track treatment response.
Results
The authors enrolled 63 patients with pleural mesothelioma into their study. The average age in the cohort was 59 years-old. Most patients were male (94%) and most presented with epithelial histology. The median time between first-line chemotherapy and the start of this second-line study was 6 months.
10 patients in the study group demonstrated a partial response to the treatment. 43 patients demonstrated stable disease, which was defined in the study design as 6 consecutive months without any evidence of progression. 10 patients experienced progressive disease, but the authors noted that these 10 patients did not complete the recommended number of cycles.
Median survival for the group averaged 9.6 months.
The treatment was generally well-tolerated, but a number of patients did experience strong side effects, with the most common being neutropenia, anemia, constipation, neuropathy and phlebitis.
The authors state that there were no statistically significant differences in response or survival when controlling for histological type, stage or performance status.
Conclusion
The results of this study indicate that vinorelbine is well-tolerated and moderately effective as second-line chemotherapy for pleural mesothelioma. The authors note that median survival time was greater than would expected and they cite a number of previous studies that have also shown vinorelbine’s activity for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma. The authors conclude their article by calling for more studies on the use of vinorelbine as both a first-line and as a second-line treatment for mesothelioma.
Labels: mesothelioma
posted by Belluck & Fox at 9:53 AM
Mesothelioma Forum
Legal Help Blog
Find a Doctor Near You
About Mesothelioma