News Categories
Resources For Living
Mesothelioma Forum
Legal Help Blog
Find a Doctor Near You
Mesothelioma Blog
Latest News
- Second-Hand Asbestos Exposure Responsible for Some Mesothelioma Cases
- Lab-on-Bead Offers Potential to Quickly Develop New Treatment for Mesothelioma
- “Rock for Doc” Concert Held to Raise Money for Doctor’s Mesothelioma Treatments
- NY Mesothelioma and Asbestos Attorney Applauds Changes to City’s Building Inspection Oversight
- Mesothelioma Patient Cancer-Free Five Years After Innovative Treatment
- University of Arizona’s Cancer Center Hopes to Become Premier Mesothelioma Treatment Facility in the Southwest
- SBRT, Useful for Treating Mesothelioma, to be Discussed at 2010 ASTRO Conference
- British Man Fights Mesothelioma by Running
- Ogdensburg Receives Grant Money to Demolish Buildings Known to Contain Mesothelioma-Causing Asbestos
- ADI-PEG 20 Shows Promise in Inhibiting Mesothelioma Cancer Cell Growth
Monday, April 23, 2007
Source: Billings Gazette
Libby, Montana is the location of what the EPA calls “the worst case of community-wide exposure to a toxic substance in U.S. history.” One of Libby’s major revenue sources was its vermiculite mine, but in 1990 it was discovered that the mine was contaminated with asbestos and that this contamination had exposed thousands of people to the many dangers of asbestos exposure, such as lung cancer and mesothelioma. There have now been over 192 deaths and 345 other cases of people made ill because of exposure to the asbestos-contaminated mine.
The primary responsibility for care and screening for these victims has been The Center for Asbestos Related Disease, a 2003 spin-off from the hospital in Libby. While the Center’s main goal has been the care and screening of more than 1500 patients, the Center is also dedicated to researching new treatments and diagnostic techniques. The Center works in conjunction with other organizations, such as the Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation, on a variety of research projects. One of its current projects is studying the actual asbestos-subtype found in Libby, as it differs in significant ways from the most common form of asbestos, chrysotile. Unlike chrysotile, whose fibers are serpentine-shaped and flexible, the type of asbestos found in Libby has hard, needlike fibers.
In 2001 the federal Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry completed a study which found that fully 19 percent of the population in and around Libby had physical signs of health-related abnormalities consistent with asbestos exposure.
Labels: asbestos, LungCancer, mesothelioma
posted by Belluck & Fox at 1:52 PM
